Re: WORM and Read Only Tables (v0.1) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 10:48 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> > The requirement was, anyway, that we be able to read old versions of
> > "archived" rows.  IIRC there was an implementation choice, whether we would
> > _never_ allow such rows to be SET READ WRITE or whether they'd be
> > immediately upgraded to the present format on SET READ WRITE.
> 
> Well, in theory we need this capability for upgrade-in-place too.  While that 
> project has kind of stalled for the moment, we'll pick it back up again soon.

Who was working on it?

--  Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com