Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4
Date
Msg-id 11936.1412373319@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-10-03 12:40:21 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Well, I think the issue is that having a GUC that can't reasonably be
>> tuned by 95% of our users is nearly useless.  Few users are going to run
>> benchmarks to see what the optimal value is.

> It's possible to convince customers to play with a performance
> influencing parameter and see how the results are. Even in
> production.

I'm a bit dubious that people will be willing to experiment in production
with a GUC that requires a database restart to change.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Dynamic LWLock tracing via pg_stat_lwlock (proof of concept)