Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Daniel Farina wrote:
>> There's also a benefit for the committers who would *like* to use Git being
>> able to take advantage of its features in that scenario. As-is just fixing
>> cvsps (and cvsimport) doesn't provide an incremental strategy for switching to
>> Git for the purposes of writes to the repository.
> That's hardly worth worrying about. There's only a handful of active
> committers. Coordinating a big-bang switch wouldn't be hard after the
> decision to convert was made.
The problem is to convince those active committers that they want to switch.
regards, tom lane
