Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2007-10-19 kell 15:42, kirjutas Joe Conway:
> Decibel! wrote:
> > On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> >>
> >> Seriously though, I can change it for 8.3, but is it really worth
> >> back-patching?
> >
> > I think it'd be worth changing for 8.3. While C forces you to worry
> > about memory, SQL does not, so I bet this is a surprise to most folks.
>
> I don't think anyone has ever noticed -- certainly not enough to
> complain in the past 5 years. This behavior has been the same since day
> one. I don't mind changing it, but I don't see it as a big deal.
Most likely nobody ever uses un-named connection beyond initial testing.
--------------
Hannu
