Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Date
Msg-id 1191996482.4233.117.camel@ebony.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 18:35 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> I think this project has got too big for us to make things up as we go 
> along. We need to follow processes that are well understood and 
> transparent.

Well said, I very much agree.

Mostly we do, but since we've just spent more than 6 months between
Feature Freeze and Beta. There were no well understood or transparent
processes during that period, so nobody is on solid ground trying to
enforce a small number of rules with a single individual. Especially
when discussing what might be argued was a major item in 8.3

--  Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as