Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types
Date
Msg-id 1191606690.4223.426.camel@ebony.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 13:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I'll look at documenting that.
> 
> I think the problem here is you've not bothered to read the manual,
> because all of these behaviors *are* documented; two of them are
> furthermore required by the SQL standard.

Your thoughts aren't correct, but why so touchy?

There is no comment in the manual here
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/arrays.html#AEN6096
which is the logical place for it to live, but I explored other places
too.

Why would you object to improving the manual?

--  Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: Not *quite* there on ecpg fixes
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types