On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 15:50 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Somebody who wants the
> > above behavior can send "ROLLBACK; DISCARD ALL".
>
> ...which generates an ERROR if no transaction is in progress and fills
> the log needlessly.
Well, it's a WARNING, but your point is taken. Can't a clueful interface
just check what the transaction status of the connection is, rather than
unconditionally issuing a ROLLBACK?
-Neil
