On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 13:32 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 10 August 2007 07:47, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 12:22:40PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > I was reading the recent Slashdot thread on MySQL earlier and once again
> > > saw a number of people saying they would use PostgreSQL except for the
> > > lack of replication. This seems to me to be the widespread FUD about
> > > postgres these days.
> > >
>
> Do you really think people dont know postgresql has replication? I find it
> more that the general use of the term replication implies a built in
> solution, which we do not have.
Every time I attend a trade show this is the #1 question:
"Do you have replication?"
We need to bear in mind that non-supporters of PostgreSQL are fairly
vocal about the "fact" that we "dont support replication".
-- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
