Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
Date
Msg-id 11870.1133456081@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Check for integer overflow in datetime functions  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
Responses Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
List pgsql-patches
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> Check integer conversion for overflow in datetime functions.

Looks reasonable, will check and apply.

> This patch should apply cleanly against HEAD and 8.1.  If the patch
> looks good then I'll submit patches for earlier branches when I get
> a chance to build and test those versions.

Don't worry about that, I'll take care of it.  I prefer committing all
the branches at once when doing a multi-branch fix (less clutter in
the CVS logs).

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow an alias for the target table in UPDATE/DELETE
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions