Re: Win32 processCancelRequest/waitpid (was fork/exec patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Win32 processCancelRequest/waitpid (was fork/exec patch
Date
Msg-id 11859.1073764458@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Win32 processCancelRequest/waitpid (was fork/exec patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Win32 processCancelRequest/waitpid (was fork/exec patch
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> As I understand it, the postmaster shared memory idea is good because
> only the postmaster writes to it, and only the backends read from it.
> If the HANDLE works the same way, I think you should put it into the
> shared memory too, hence (b).

But the postmaster needs to use the HANDLE, hence not (b).

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 processCancelRequest/waitpid (was fork/exec patch
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: psql-current italian translation updates