Hi,
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 20:22 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I'm checking into this, but it may take a few days to get an answer
> > (particularly since I'm planning to take Friday through Monday off).
>
> Well if we go RHEL why not CentOS5 and just call it good?
...because RHEL and CentOS are not really that identical. They are just
binary-compilant.
RHEL has better performance than CentOS -- I guess it is the compiler
options that Red Hat is using while compiling their RPMs.
I have performed a test using OSDL test suite a few months ago on a
system that has:
* 8 x86_64 CPUs @ 3200.263
* 16 Gigabytes of RAM
* PostgreSQL 8.1.5 (PGDG packages)
and RHEL performed much better than CentOS.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
