Re: varchar(n) VS text - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Kev
Subject Re: varchar(n) VS text
Date
Msg-id 1182857768.298640.272710@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: varchar(n) VS text  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: varchar(n) VS text  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Jun 26, 12:16 am, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) wrote:
> "Pierre Thibaudeau" <pierd...@gmail.com> writes:
> > I am puzzling over this issue:
> > 1) Is there ever ANY reason to prefer "varchar(n)" to "text" as a column type?
>
> In words of one syllable: no.

If you have any input from untrusted sources (like in a web app)
wouldn't it be easier to attack the server if you had a text field,
like by sending a couple TB of data over that pgsql then needs to
store, on a server that doesn't have that amount of space?

Er...I guess the web server would then be the cap?  Or whatever other
tiers you had between the client and pgsql?

Kev


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sergei Shelukhin
Date:
Subject: what's wrong with this conf file?
Next
From: "Gurjeet Singh"
Date:
Subject: Re: a JOIN on same table, but 'slided over'