Re: Apparent Wraparound? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From g.hintermayer@inode.at
Subject Re: Apparent Wraparound?
Date
Msg-id 1182198497.043063.277700@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Apparent Wraparound?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Apparent Wraparound?
List pgsql-general
Aha, google thinks it's wise to make the last postings (probably if
more than n ?) show only the poster name and make the name clickable.
Not  very userfriendly :-( but now i know it ;-)

Sorry if that wasn't clear. I'm getting the same log entry as the
original
poster, i.e.: LOG:  could not truncate directory "pg_subtrans":
apparent
wraparound.

I'm just running an analysis of the "daily transaction id consumption"
on my databases to see, if the uptime of the server matches with the
time the wraparound was logged.

Gerhard


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "John Smith"
Date:
Subject: postgresql and solaris 10: pitch to sysadmins
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Pg_standby and shutting down the warm standby