On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 11:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > checkpoint_maxpages would seem like a better name; we've already had
> > those _maxpages settings for 3 releases, so changing that is not really
> > an option (at so late a stage).
>
> Sure it is.
Maybe, but we need a proposal before we agree to change anything.
If we can get rid of them, good, but if we can't I'd like to see a clear
posting of the parameters, their meaning and suggested names before we
commit this, please.
BTW, checkpoint_write_percent actually does what I wanted, but I wasn't
able to guess that from the name. checkpoint_duration_percent?
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
