Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From yyyc186
Subject Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array)
Date
Msg-id 1181758185.903616.34980@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array)  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
On May 11, 12:08 pm, j...@commandprompt.com ("Joshua D. Drake") wrote:
> Geoffrey wrote:
>
> People still use OpenVMS? ... elitist isn't the word I would choose ;)
>

Not only do they use it, new books get written about doing application
development with it.  It is still the only OS able to create a fault
tolerant world-wide cluster with complete transaction management
across all nodes.  Not just database transactions, but file level and
message queue all integrated with one transaction manager.

Take a look at http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com for information
about "The Minimum You Need to Know to Be an OpenVMS Application
Developer"


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Terry Fielder
Date:
Subject: Re: DeadLocks..., DeadLocks...
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] setof or array as input parameter to postgresql 8.2 functions