Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
Date
Msg-id 117edb9c-1ddd-9305-8946-82c6ff63ac20@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/6/16 2:58 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> 0001-0003 look clear to me as well. 0006 - 0009 also seem OK. The rest 
> really only make sense if we decided to make the switch to C++.

I have committed 0001, 0002, 0003, 0006, as well as 0012.  Thomas Munro
had some interesting comments on 0007-0009 that are worth considering
further.

The rest of the patches will be kept around for future amusement.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: PoC: Make it possible to disallow WHERE-less UPDATE and DELETE
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres