On May 22, 12:14 pm, l...@peufeu.com (PFC) wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007 10:23:03 +0200, valgog <val...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I found several post about INSERT/UPDATE performance in this group,
> > but actually it was not really what I am searching an answer for...
>
> > I have a simple reference table WORD_COUNTS that contains the count of
> > words that appear in a word array storage in another table.
>
> Mmm.
>
> If I were you, I would :
>
> - Create a procedure that flattens all the arrays and returns all the
> words :
>
> PROCEDURE flatten_arrays RETURNS SETOF TEXT
> FOR word_array IN SELECT word_array FROM your_table LOOP
> FOR i IN 1...array_upper( word_array ) LOOP
> RETURN NEXT tolower( word_array[ i ] )
>
> So, SELECT * FROM flatten_arrays() returns all the words in all the arrays.
> To get the counts quickly I'd do this :
>
> SELECT word, count(*) FROM flatten_arrays() AS word GROUP BY word
>
> You can then populate your counts table very easily and quickly, since
> it's just a seq scan and hash aggregate. One second for 10.000 rows would
> be slow.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
good idea indeed! will try this approach.
