Re: Async commands (like drop index) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: Async commands (like drop index)
Date
Msg-id 1179508841.6059.4.camel@goldbach
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Async commands (like drop index)  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
Responses Re: Async commands (like drop index)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2007-18-05 at 11:47 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Assuming the concurrent psql stuff gets in, do you still see a use for
> this?

I think concurrent psql (and/or async libpq) is the right way to handle
this sort of requirement. "DROP INDEX NOWAIT" is hacky, and would be
difficult (impossible?) to implement in a reasonable manner: the backend
is fundamentally single-threaded. Also, how does the client learn when
the DROP INDEX actually finishes? The client would either need to poll
the database, or we'd need to implement something like select() --
neither is a very appealing alternative.

-1 from me: this functionality belongs on the client-side, where
asynchronous operations are much easier to manage.

-Neil




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Async commands (like drop index)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Async commands (like drop index)