Re: Interaction of PITR backups andBulkoperationsavoiding WAL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Interaction of PITR backups andBulkoperationsavoiding WAL
Date
Msg-id 1177661038.3715.68.camel@silverbirch.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulkoperationsavoiding WAL  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Interaction of PITR backups andBulkoperationsavoiding WAL
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 18:51 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> It strikes me that allowing archive_command to be changed on the fly
> > > >> might not be such a good idea though, or at least it shouldn't be
> > > >> possible to flip it from empty to nonempty during live operation.
> > > 
> > > > I'd rather fix it the proposed way than force a restart. ISTM wrong to
> > > > have an availability feature cause downtime.
> > > 
> > > I don't think that people are very likely to need to turn archiving on
> > > and off on-the-fly.  Your proposed solution introduces a great deal of
> > > complexity (and risk of future bugs-of-omission, to say nothing of race
> > > conditions) to solve a non-problem.  We have better things to be doing
> > > with our development time.
> > 
> > It's certainly a quicker fix. Unless others object, I'll set
> > archive_command to only be changeable at server startup.
> 
> Simon, has this patch been submitted?

Yes

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to InstallCheck failure]
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reviewers Guide to DeferredTransactions/TransactionGuarantee