Re: Curious buildfarm failures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Curious buildfarm failures
Date
Msg-id 11767.1358217578@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Curious buildfarm failures  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
> The problem seems to be when the the old and the key hash to the same 
> bucket. In that case, hash_update_hash_key() tries to link the entry to 
> itself. The attached patch fixes it for me.

Doh!  I had a feeling that that needed a special case, but didn't think
hard enough.  Thanks.

I think the patch could do with more than no comment, but will fix
that and apply.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vlad Arkhipov
Date:
Subject: Re: Get current query in a trigger function
Next
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date:
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v4