Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> On 09/15/2015 10:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I can't argue with that, I suppose, but I think row_security=force is
>> a pretty useful convenience. If we must remove it, so be it, but I'd
>> be a little sad.
> There are use cases where row_security=force will be set in production
> environments, not only in testing.
What cases, exactly, and is there another way to solve those problems?
I concur with Noah's feeling that allowing security behavior to depend on
a GUC is risky.
regards, tom lane
