Re: Persistent main memory Storage Manager - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Persistent main memory Storage Manager
Date
Msg-id 11753.1076778048@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Persistent main memory Storage Manager  (Diego Montenegro <diego.montenegro@yale.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Diego Montenegro <diego.montenegro@yale.edu> writes:
> Also, in released versions, MM.c is included but not used, does anyone
> know if it should work if we define the STABLE_MEMORY_STORAGE, or do a
> lot  coding has to be done for it to work?

Actually, I removed that file a few days ago because I didn't see any
point in updating it to match the recent smgr API changes.  Seems very
unlikely that it'd still work, given that it hasn't been maintained for
so many years.

It's unclear to me why anyone would bother with it anyway.  Putting
$PGDATA on a RAM disk should have approximately the same effect.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] dollar quoting
Next
From: Joseph Tate
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore problems and suggested resolution