Re: _FORTIFY_SOURCE by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: _FORTIFY_SOURCE by default?
Date
Msg-id 11751.1347809162@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: _FORTIFY_SOURCE by default?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 09/16/2012 12:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Doesn't seem like a good idea to me to add platform-specific options
>> with unspecified effects to platform-independent upstream sources.

> Might be worth having a buildfarm animal or two building with it, say by 
> setting CFLAGS before configure?

Possibly, but only if we actually pay attention to build warnings on
those animals.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: _FORTIFY_SOURCE by default?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to include c.h