RE: [HACKERS] Keyword - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Meskes, Michael
Subject RE: [HACKERS] Keyword
Date
Msg-id 11720CEF3853D011AC0C00A024B7A9E110A174@einstein.topsystem.de
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
I wholeheartly agree. AFAIK it does nothing else, but ORACLE likes it.
And most users have experience in ORACLE.

Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager    | topystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de                    | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org                      | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux!      | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44

> ----------
> From:     Thomas G. Lockhart[SMTP:lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu]
> Sent:     Freitag, 13. März 1998 16:04
> To:     Michael Meskes
> Cc:     PostgreSQL Hacker
> Subject:     Re: [HACKERS] Keyword
>
> > I'm currently trying to get ecpg more in line with the backends
> > parser. Doing so I found ecpg accepts a syntax the backend doesn't.
> > It's 'commit work release' which is accepted for compatibility with
> > Oracle. How about allowing this in the backend, too?
>
> I don't want to sound too fussy here, but does this statement provide
> any functionality missing from the SQL92 syntax 'commit [work]'? If
> not,
> then perhaps Oracle users could start writing portable code if they
> cared to?
>
>                        - Tom
>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?
Next
From: "Meskes, Michael"
Date:
Subject: RE: AW: [HACKERS] Begin statement again