Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Hammond
Subject Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base
Date
Msg-id 1171390267.966146.124320@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Feb 12, 5:16 pm, j...@commandprompt.com ("Joshua D. Drake") wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> >> Is this a known problem?  Is there any test procedure that builds the
> >> "base" distribution before release?
>
> > Most of the core team is convinced that the postgresql-foo tarballs are
> > useless, but Marc insists on keeping them.  But since they are nearly
> > useless, no one tests them, so it is not surprising that they don't
> > work.
>
> Why do we keep them again? I can't recall at any point in the life of
> CMD us ever using the -foo tarballs. Not to mention they just take up space.
>
> Let's dump them.

The FreeBSD database/postgres* ports depend on them. Which is probably
why Marc insists on keeping them.

Andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Faster StrNCpy
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: cuckoo is hung during regression test