Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom CommandIDs,updated patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom CommandIDs,updated patch
Date
Msg-id 1170990678.22638.23.camel@silverbirch.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 00:08 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: 
> > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> Packed doesn't seem to have quite the right connotation either --- it
> > > >> sounds like it means there are two separable fields in the CID value.
> > > >> 
> > > >> Maybe "composite cid"?
> > > 
> > > > At one point I was thinking "combo". but "composite" sounds good.
> > 
> > Combo is OK, because it's a *combination* of two CommandIds. 
> > 
> > That means they are ComboCommandIds or CCIs.
> 
> CCI is CommandCounterIncrement to me, so let's not use that
> abbreviation.

True; given the similar context that would be a mistake.

Just ComboIds then? I was worried that was cid also.

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch