Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch
Date
Msg-id 1170990229.22638.19.camel@silverbirch.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs, updated patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: 
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Packed doesn't seem to have quite the right connotation either --- it
> >> sounds like it means there are two separable fields in the CID value.
> >> 
> >> Maybe "composite cid"?
> 
> > At one point I was thinking "combo". but "composite" sounds good.

Combo is OK, because it's a *combination* of two CommandIds. 

That means they are ComboCommandIds or CCIs.

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bad bug in fopen() wrapper code
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch