Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Hammond
Subject Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?
Date
Msg-id 1170958747.270818.63310@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?  ("Larry Rosenman" <ler@lerctr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 19 2006, 9:36 pm, l...@lerctr.org ("Larry Rosenman") wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Larry Rosenman" <lrosen...@pervasive.com> writes:
> >>     I've got a fastFreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm
> >> on.
>
> >>     However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.
>
> >>     My questions are:
> >>     1) do we need another one?
> >>     2) if yes, what options need coverage?
>
> > Looks like we're fairly well covered onfreebsdalready.  Are you
> > willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?
>
> Not particularly, as I want it to do other things.  However, I might be
> willing
> To get VMWare running on it, and run something else in a VM.
>
> What were you thinking?


FreeBSD 6.2 was just released. I don't see any coverage for it yet.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: referential Integrity and SHARE locks
Next
From: "Andrew Hammond"
Date:
Subject: FreeBSD 6.2 ./configure plays oddly when building 8.2.2 from tarball