On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:19, Tim Tassonis wrote:
> > The FSF says the MPL is not compatible with the GPL, but, well, the FSF
> > generally finds **all** non-GPL licenses incompatible with the GPL (BSD,
> > MPL, Apache, etc.). The only truly GPL-compatible license I know of is
> > LGPL (and there have been arguments about that). That’s the problem
> > with the GPL. You’re not agreeing to open source your code as much as
> > you’re agreeing to abide by the FSF’s political beliefs. Political
> > lock-in for developers in lieu of vendor lock-in for end-users.
>
> Quite political stuff in a technical posting from somebody apparently
> disliking mixing politics and open source, eh?
>
> It's been said a million times by BSD advocats: put one line of code
> under GPL and you instantly become a willingless slave of Richard
> Stallmans hoards of children-eating communists.
That's ridiculous. Everybody knows that they're more socialists at
heart.
