Re: Lock compatibility matrix - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Lock compatibility matrix
Date
Msg-id 1170189900.3681.238.camel@silverbirch.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Lock compatibility matrix  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-patches
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 21:33 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > Why would we want to have two redundant copies of the same
> > > information?
> >
> > The lock information is not available anywhere in the form of a
> > matrix.
>
> But it will be.  A patch for the documentation has been proposed.

Cool. When that's done, we probably don't need the code version.

Would've been helpful if you'd explained what you meant... not many
people read all posts on all lists.

--
  Simon Riggs
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Lock compatibility matrix
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_standby