Re: Scanner/Parser question - what does _P imply? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From
Subject Re: Scanner/Parser question - what does _P imply?
Date
Msg-id 1169757287.14369.9.camel@sakai.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Scanner/Parser question - what does _P imply?  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
<blockquote type="CITE"><pre>
<font color="#000000">> Some years ago there was discussion of consistently P-ifying *all* those</font>
<font color="#000000">> macros, but it didn't get done; I think Thomas or somebody objected that</font>
<font color="#000000">> it would make gram.y needlessly harder to read.</font>

<font color="#000000">Are there many people who read gram.y on a regular base?</font>
</pre></blockquote><br /> I can't seem to put it down :-)<br /><br /> >From the back cover:<br /><blockquote> A
rollercoasterride of passion, heart-stopping adventures, and gut-wrenching laughs ... every bit as thrilling as
copyfuncs.c,more of a tearjerker than bufmgr.c, and as deliciously naughty as MySQL's item.cc.  <br /></blockquote><br
/>Get <i><b>gram.y</b></i>, in stores now (or order at Amazon.com, delivered in a plain brown wrapper).<br /><br /><br
/>            -- Korry  

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Scanner/Parser question - what does _P imply?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #2917: spi_prepare doesn't accept typename aliases