On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 13:41 -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> BTW, it seems that while Oracle provides an IS NAN construct, they also
> treat NaN as equal to itself (which makes me question why they added IS
> NAN in the first place). So perhaps it is sufficient to leave things as
> they are...
Patch applied, without the NaN TODO item.
-Neil
