Re: [PERFORM] unusual performance for vac following 8.2upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 16:11 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > It's not clear to me how this fix will alter the INSERT issue Kim
> > mentions.
>
> I didn't say that it would; we have no information on the INSERT issue,
> so I'm just concentrating on the problem that he did provide info on.

OK.

> I'm frankly not real surprised that there are performance issues with
> such a huge pg_class; it's not a regime that anyone's spent any time
> optimizing.

Yeh, I saw a pg_class that big once, but it just needed a VACUUM.

Temp relations still make pg_class entried don't they? Is that on the
TODO list to change?

--
  Simon Riggs
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com