Re: pg9 beta1, make check fails - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg9 beta1, make check fails
Date
Msg-id 11684.1272983863@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg9 beta1, make check fails  (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>)
Responses Re: pg9 beta1, make check fails  (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>)
List pgsql-general
Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net> writes:
> On 5/3/2010 9:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not immediately seeing a simple way to improve this.

> How about building a statically linked psql in 'make check', just for
> pg_regress to use?

[ shrug... ]  That sort of defeats the purpose of testing the binaries
we are intending to install.

Actually I guess the real question here is why psql failed to link to
the newly-built shared libraries.  pg_regress sets up LD_LIBRARY_PATH
but that seems not to have done the trick for you.  What platform are
you on exactly?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Richard Broersma
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding surrogate keys
Next
From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding surrogate keys