Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
Date
Msg-id 1167947.1712286650@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests  (Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>)
Responses Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
List pgsql-hackers
Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name> writes:
> It works with the latest libedit 20230828-3.1.  Have to check the NetBSD
> source to find out what changed since 20181209-3.1.

Yeah, the test is passing on mamba which is running the (just
officially released) NetBSD 10.0.  I'm not sure whether 10.0
has the "latest" libedit or something a little further back.
sidewinder, with NetBSD 9.3, is happy as well.  But 20181209
presumably belongs to NetBSD 8.x, which is theoretically still
in support, so maybe it's worth poking into.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Next
From: Erik Wienhold
Date:
Subject: Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests