Re: TODO: GNU TLS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Date
Msg-id 1167434510.20777.14.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TODO: GNU TLS  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: TODO: GNU TLS  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 17:57 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 29 December 2006 14:49, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > entirely.
> > >
> > > 4) GNUTLS development seems more active? OpenSSL has been in a
> > > frozen/mature state for a while. I don't understand why OpenSSL is still
> > > labelled as 0.9.x, which might indicate alpha quality, under heavy
> > > development.
> > >
> > > I don't find the reasons too compelling - but they are points to
> > > consider.
> >
> > 5) GNUTLS does not run well under all of our supported platforms.
> >
> 
> given options like --enable-dtrace and --with-libedit-preferred, I don't find 
> this argument compelling...

I don't like either of those options either.

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997            http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Next
From: "Jaime Casanova"
Date:
Subject: Re: Deadline-Based Vacuum Delay