On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 16:48 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
> > Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes
> > into "operator families", as per discussion last week. It's far from
> > ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments. What's done
> > is ...
>
> > Comments?
>
> Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress
> would be more visible?
I thought it did? Tom's marked this clearly as WIP.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
