Re: to_char/to_number loses sign - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: to_char/to_number loses sign
Date
Msg-id 11671.1098811644@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: to_char/to_number loses sign  (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> writes:
> Yes, you're right. It strange, but NUM_S missing there. The conversion
> from string to number is less stable part of formatting.c...

> The patch is in the attachment.

This patch causes the regression tests to fail.  I think you need to
consider the to_char() side of it more carefully.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: rmtree() failure on Windows
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Postresql 8.0 Beta 3 - SELECT ... FOR UPDATE