Re: effective_cache_size vs units - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date
Msg-id 1166568184.22487.156.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: effective_cache_size vs units  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 23:39 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> In most cases, I just assume they would just assume
> >> they can't use units on it because the default value in the file
> >> doesn't have units.
> > 
> > But the default value *does* have units.
> > 
> It does? Didn't in my file. I must've overwritten it with a config file
> from some earlier beta (or snapshot) that didn't have it or so - my
> default value certainly didn't have it ;-)

Just to confirm, yes the sample I submitted a patch for does have units.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> //Magnus
> 
-- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997            http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Companies Contributing to Open Source
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units