Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE (was: [GENERAL] pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matt Miller
Subject 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE (was: [GENERAL] pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch)
Date
Msg-id 1166471069.16068.281035729@webmail.messagingengine.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE (was: [GENERAL] pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> When I apply pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch to Postgres REL8_2_STABLE I get
> a handful of rejects.

The patch applies to the 8.2.0 tarball  without rejects and without
fuzz. That's good.  Now on to some fun with pgcluster...

However, the patch will not apply to cvs branch REL8_2_0.  This all
raises the question: what's the difference between REL8_2_STABLE,
REL8_2_0, and the 8.2.0 tarball?

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthew O'Connor
Date:
Subject: Re: Vaccuming dead rows on busy databases
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE