On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 13:52 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > It would probably be far easier for long-term maintenance if you
> > > just built an independent lexer, instead of trying to make
> > > guc-file.l serve multiple masters.
> >
> > Will do.
>
> I'm actually not so sure that this is a good idea. The lexical
> structure should be exactly the same, and some things like include
> files might become useful as well, so why should all this be
> replicated?
I assumed the actual lexer would be the same, just the code that invokes
it would be different. I'm happy to do things either way.
-- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
