Re: old synchronized scan patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: old synchronized scan patch
Date
Msg-id 1165434949.3839.429.camel@silverbirch.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: old synchronized scan patch  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: old synchronized scan patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: old synchronized scan patch  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 11:46 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:

> If you make the join/leave operations such that there is no resistance
> at all (no timeout or anything), then it becomes the same as my non-
> synchronized proposal, right?

Teamwork requires some synchronisation to be effective, but yeh there
needs to be a way to leave the Conga if its not working for you/them.

I think we need the synchronisation to make concurrent scans effective,
plus Brownian Scans doesnt have the same ring to it :-)

I'm still willing to help if you're willing to take this further.

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: psql return codes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: old synchronized scan patch