Re: Dynamic Tracing docs - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Dynamic Tracing docs
Date
Msg-id 1165063809.3778.987.camel@silverbirch.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Dynamic Tracing docs  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Dynamic Tracing docs  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
Re: Dynamic Tracing docs  (Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-patches
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 09:43 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Enclose new trace.sgml file as discussed on -docs.
>
> I have a question here, regarding this:
>
>    To include DTrace support in a 64-bit binary, specify --enable-dtrace
>    and DTRACEFLAGS="-64" to configure.
>
> The dtrace documentation says that dtrace automatically picks the right
> build environment.  Something is wrong here.  Either the dtrace
> documentation or ours.

I didn't presume to question Robert's technical notes
http://blogs.sun.com/robertlor/entry/user_level_dtrace_probes_in

Robert, Can you throw any light on this? Or do you have any further
comments on the docs?
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/dynamic-trace.html

--
  Simon Riggs
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Dynamic Tracing docs
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC description cleanup