On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 20:35 +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> Well yes, but as far as I know that never happen, and we have been
> >>> implementing the new version with the above syntax for a year and our
> >>> GUC variables have been around for over 4 years.
> >> Sorry, new version of what? what GUC variables?
> >
> > Our new version of replicator (1.7) has been in development for a year
> > and that is the version that supports ALTER TABLE.
> >
> > The GUC variables we use have mostly been static for years. 1.7 has some
> > clean up etc..
>
> Aha. Well, could you name the places where you'd need hooks? Would you
> like to use hooks? What purpose would that serve you?
I would be the wrong person to ask however, I can say that I don't see a
need for the hooks. If we somehow (the community) created some
reasonable generic interface, we would likely make use of it but other
then that, I am happy with how we are doing it.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
