On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 15:56 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I know EnterpriseDB is trying to have PostgreSQL mentioned in all their
> > > articles, but I supposed because it is an article that includes all open
> > > source databases (or based on open source databases like EnterpriseDB),
> > > it wasn't possible.
> >
> > Honestly, I applaud the EnterpriseDB PR machine, and there is no reason
> > they should have to provide a mention to PostgreSQL. If they choose to,
> > I thank them as a community member. If not, it is their product and I
> > wish them the best.
>
> EnterpriseDB tries to get PostgreSQL mentioned if possible. There are
> strong ethical and business reasons to do that.
I am not suggesting they don't. I was just saying from my perspective I
didn't have a problem if they did, or didn't. My only complaint is being
addressed off list :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
