On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?iso-8859-2?Q?Marcin_Ma=F1k?= <marcin.mank@gmail.com> writes:
> > I have an unconfirmed feeling that autovac does not like system-wide
> > statement_timeout.
>
> If you have it set to less than the time needed to do a vacuum, then
> yes, autovac will fail. You expected differently? Do you think it's
> a good idea for autovac to ignore statement_timeout? (Maybe it is,
> but I suspect we'd get complaints about that too.)
Autovac *must* ignore statement_timeout if it is doing a wraparound
avoidance scan, surely?
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
