On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 18:19 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If we document it, we have to keep it current, even if
> we improve it later.
Sounds like all the rest of the docs then...
We really need a guide to deciphering the logs, so that people can
understand how to tune things.
> I will say I had trouble testing this logging
> because it requires a C program to use that protocol. Here is the test
> program I used.
Thanks, I'll look into this.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
