Re: Extended protocol logging - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Extended protocol logging
Date
Msg-id 1162401626.3587.133.camel@silverbirch.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Extended protocol logging  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 10:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> With what logging settings?  log_duration has rather different behavior
> >> from what it used to do.
> 
> > I think it would be useful to have the log results from a test program
> > in the protocol section,
> 
> The contents of the postmaster log are surely not part of the FE protocol.
> Clients can't even see the log without resorting to nonstandard hacks.

OK, can we please put the example from -hackers into the docs,
somewhere, with particular note of which protocol messages result in
which logging output?

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Writing WAL for relcache invalidation: pg_internal.init
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Writing WAL for relcache invalidation:pg_internal.init