Re: partitioned table performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: partitioned table performance
Date
Msg-id 1162248403.11568.370.camel@silverbirch.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partitioned table performance  (Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 22:58 +0100, Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
> Am Montag, den 30.10.2006, 08:18 +0000 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 00:28 +0200, Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
> >
> > > Any ideas how to make the optimizer handle partitioned tables more
> > > sensible?
> >
> > Yes, those are known inefficiencies in the current implementation which
> > we expect to address for 8.3.
>
> Any ideas to force the current optimizer to do something sensible?

Brute force & ignorance: PL/pgSQL

Perhaps some other domain knowledge might help you shorten the search?

Thats all for now. It's not a minor fixup and nobody had time to fix
that for 8.2 since other fish were bigger.

--
  Simon Riggs
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Kostyrka
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioned table performance
Next
From: Leif Mortenson
Date:
Subject: Index ignored on column containing mostly 0 values