Re: performace review - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: performace review
Date
Msg-id 1161616931.19772.6.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performace review  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 08:12 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 10/22/06 06:45, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> >> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> Tomi NA wrote:
> >>>> I was just reading http://www.opencrx.org/faq.htm where RDBMS engines
> >>>> are one of the questions and see pgsql bashed sentence after sentence.
> >>>> Can anyone offer any insight as to weather it's fact or FUD?
> >>> It is 100% FUD.
> >>>
> >> What would be the incentive for OpenCRX spreading FUD about PostgreSQL?
> >> Does anyone know?
> >
> > That implies malice.  The people at OpenCRX apparently really
> > believe what they wrote.
>
> I believe they probably do believe it and it was probably driven by a
> complete lack of understanding of PostgreSQL.

Actually, after reading the reply from Brandon Aiken, I believe it was
driven by a complete lack of understanding of relational theory.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fw: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - October 22 2006 ==
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: performace review